I am digging the Sata 4000
- This topic has 38 replies, 17 voices, and was last updated 13 years, 2 months ago by .
- Posts
Ryan you are bang on with your analysis of the 4000.I have been using a 4000rp for the last 3 months with excellent results.The 3000 is faster but not by much(just depends how close you spray to the panel),the first gen rp and 4000 are similar in finish and speed.I got a better finish with a 1.4 in the 3000 vs.the 1.3.The sweet spot with the 4000 is 31.5-32 psi,and it does have a nicer wider fan,it rerally is a pleasure to spray with and effortless to lay down a nice finish.It would be interesting to use another brand of clear to compare but superior 250 works very nice with the 4000.
You and your son should do a side by side hairdo comparison :roflVery nice Ryan.
I’ve heard great things about the 4000 RP, and those results look amazing. Almost too slick for finishes I’m trying to match to be honest, but that’s easily sorted.
I have to admit I’m very tempted to change my allegiance for that gun. As you know I’m a die hard Iwata fan, and absolutely love the WS400 Clear, and have no complaints about it, but I can’t help wanting the latest and greatest! 😆
I could always convert the WS to a base gun….
Jay, if you send me your gun for free I would be happy to tell you how it performs on clears other than Superior 250 :whistle:
Actually dinger I don’t want to subject my gun to FC 720….sorry 😛
[quote=”Jayson M” post=18938]Actually dinger I don’t want to subject my gun to FC 720….sorry :P[/quote]
I was gonna spray SPI with it :rofl :rofl:rofl :rofl It’s only a 1.3 that won’t work with SPI :clappy
Looking Good Ryan, I’ve heard from a few people that it sprays a lot like the first gens.
Wonder if they decided to re-work the early design, or if it’s spraying similarities are just coincidence.So I take it that the RP is now approved for use in the U.S.? Did Sata supply a compliance certification with the gun?
[quote=”Underpaid Painter” post=18982]So I take it that the RP is now approved for use in the U.S.? Did Sata supply a compliance certification with the gun?[/quote]
No it’s not. It isn’t available for sale yet in the states
[quote=”ryanbrown999″ post=18987][quote=”Underpaid Painter” post=18982]So I take it that the RP is now approved for use in the U.S.? Did Sata supply a compliance certification with the gun?[/quote]
No it’s not. It isn’t available for sale yet in the states[/quote]
You really need to get your ass over here. We get all the best stuff :p :rofl
[quote=”Andy T” post=18997][quote=”ryanbrown999″ post=18987][quote=”Underpaid Painter” post=18982]So I take it that the RP is now approved for use in the U.S.? Did Sata supply a compliance certification with the gun?[/quote]
No it’s not. It isn’t available for sale yet in the states[/quote]
You really need to get your ass over here. We get all the best stuff :p :rofl[/quote]
Where do you think my sata came from 😉 the digi gauge even reads in bar.
I think you would like the 4000 Andy. Maybe you can nag on your Debeer rep and get one to try. To be honest it probably sprays quite similar to the WS400. They both have the same style of pattern. I was a pretty die hard Iwata guy also Andy but I have to say I have been happier with my RP’s for clear. The LS base gun over here does handle waterborne base very well. I am still trying to get a WS400 to demo for clear.
[quote=”Jayson M” post=18932]Ryan you are bang on with your analysis of the 4000.I have been using a 4000rp for the last 3 months with excellent results.The 3000 is faster but not by much(just depends how close you spray to the panel),the first gen rp and 4000 are similar in finish and speed.I got a better finish with a 1.4 in the 3000 vs.the 1.3.The sweet spot with the 4000 is 31.5-32 psi,and it does have a nicer wider fan,it rerally is a pleasure to spray with and effortless to lay down a nice finish.It would be interesting to use another brand of clear to compare but superior 250 works very nice with the 4000.
You and your son should do a side by side hairdo comparison :rofl[/quote]
You spraying with a 1.3 or 1.4 4000 rp?I always go with what sata suggests for sikkens.With that said they are reccomending a 1.2-1.3 fo the 4000rp and I chose the larger 1.3.Sata reccomended 1.3-1.4 for the first gen and 3000rp(I used a 1.4).I don’t know how sata measures but there sizes are all over the place.The first gen 1.4 is about the size of a 3000rp 1.3,and the 1.3 4000rp is like a 1.4 3000rp,very strange and like I said the size of the orfice is all over the place, :blink:
[quote=”Jayson M” post=19020]I always go with what sata suggests for sikkens.With that said they are reccomending a 1.2-1.3 fo the 4000rp and I chose the larger 1.3.Sata reccomended 1.3-1.4 for the first gen and 3000rp(I used a 1.4).I don’t know how sata measures but there sizes are all over the place.The first gen 1.4 is about the size of a 3000rp 1.3,and the 1.3 4000rp is like a 1.4 3000rp,very strange and like I said the size of the orfice is all over the place, :blink:[/quote]
My first sata was a 1.4 rp,and I liked it better than the 1.3 3000 rp I use now for clear,but I like to hog it on,just seemed to lay down flatter with the 1.4.
We have a new sata rep that’s supposed to be out this week with a demo gun,and I think they said they’re bringing us 1.3’s.So what`s the difference between the RP & the B?
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.