Primer Gun

Home / Forums / Shop Operations / Primer Gun

Viewing 15 posts - 31 through 45 (of 64 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • January 27, 2013 at 8:46 pm #40693

    sure but saying your new sagola layed polysurfacer like glass is kind of pointless :huh: .Hang around here long enough and you will learn how to spray your clear smoother 😉

    January 27, 2013 at 8:51 pm #40694

    Well this IS a post on primer guns. What am I supposed to say?
    And I totally get why some here are not on board and tired of hearing about these guns. But for this one, I cant help but rave about it. It is as good as he says (in my oppinion). The other 2 havent proven that to me yet. Or maybe I havent proven it to them. But im in a shop now where I will be spray much more often, and im sure that the gun time will work out my issues with spraying.

    January 27, 2013 at 8:54 pm #40695

    What have you compared it too is my question?Have you used other good primer guns to compare it too?Its kind of like saying glasso 55 line sprayed awesome compared to omni or nason….well no shit 😛

    January 27, 2013 at 8:57 pm #40696

    [quote=”Andy T” post=29663][quote=”gtome” post=29658]1.6 for heavy stuff? That seems a little small for heavy stuff?[/quote]

    I suppose it depends on what we mean by heavy stuff. I should have been more clear.

    The Debeer 2K high build I was using for the past few years recommended 1.3 – 1.8. I found 1.6 to be just right for general priming. It also worked well with their unreduced epoxy. For really heavy stuff like poly then I’d definitely go bigger, like a 2.0, although I used to manage well enough with an Iwata W400 with a 1.8. For sealer (non-sanding primer) or reduced epoxy I’d use the same W400 with either a 1.3 or 1.4.[/quote]

    Ok that makes more sense. And you brought up a good point I hadent thought of. I was wondering what you guys used for sealers. I would hate to throw sealer in my base or clear guns (only ones I have with 1.4 tip). Not much sense in having a gun dedicated for just sealers. So haveing a primer gun with extra nozzels for different materials would be the way to go for sure.

    January 27, 2013 at 9:01 pm #40698

    [quote=”Jayson M” post=29668]What have you compared it too is my question?Have you used other good primer guns to compare it too?Its kind of like saying glasso 55 line sprayed awesome compared to omni or nason….well no shit :P[/quote]

    No, as I already said, the only real name brand primer gun I have ever used was a Finishline. But from the results I have seen, I cant imagine it getting any better. It would be like you spraying clear with your Sata and it coming out perfect glass smooth finish. Really wouldnt matter what your comparing it too.

    January 27, 2013 at 9:03 pm #40699

    Sure it would as I have used other high end guns to see a difference.Are you looking to get into a pissing contest or what :S

    January 27, 2013 at 9:06 pm #40700

    [quote=”gtome” post=29664]I agree that some will have peel, most in fact. But to say laying primer flat has “no advantages” is silly. Especially when it comes to the final primer. If the coats are good and even, you’ve blocked it out well before the last prime, it is simply less work to sand a flatter finish. For instance, I sprayed some parts with a 4:1:1 reduced final primer. Sprayed very flat. And I sprayed some 4:1 primer, and it was pretty flat, but not like the 4:1:1. Obviously grabbing some 600 grit wet paper and going at it, I will finish the 4:1:1 much sooner simply because its less work to knock down. And to me, there is some value in less sanding.

    Now if I can learn to spray my clear a little better I will be in business![/quote]

    I can see where you’re going with that if you are double priming. I rarely bother as it’s too much extra time and effort (and should be unnecessary), but if I do I like to get plenty of build on the first cycle so I can block it back nice and flat. Smooth isn’t always flat.

    On the second priming cycle I will use a more reduced primer as I should only be filling fine sanding scratches and maybe the odd break-through. This second round shold only need minimum sanding so I’ll agree there is some gain to be had from a smoother application. However, if we’re talking about poly (slick sand etc) then we’re not discussing final primers.

    As for tip size on primer guns you could always buy the biggest one you think you’ll need and wind it in a bit for less viscous stuff 🙂

    January 27, 2013 at 9:08 pm #40701

    Not at all, but you cant seem to accept the idea that this could be a good primer gun.

    January 27, 2013 at 9:12 pm #40702

    Your right about that,after trying the 4400 extreme I have no interest in trying any other products from them.

    January 27, 2013 at 9:26 pm #40703

    [quote=”Andy T” post=29673][quote=”gtome” post=29664]I agree that some will have peel, most in fact. But to say laying primer flat has “no advantages” is silly. Especially when it comes to the final primer. If the coats are good and even, you’ve blocked it out well before the last prime, it is simply less work to sand a flatter finish. For instance, I sprayed some parts with a 4:1:1 reduced final primer. Sprayed very flat. And I sprayed some 4:1 primer, and it was pretty flat, but not like the 4:1:1. Obviously grabbing some 600 grit wet paper and going at it, I will finish the 4:1:1 much sooner simply because its less work to knock down. And to me, there is some value in less sanding.

    Now if I can learn to spray my clear a little better I will be in business![/quote]

    I can see where you’re going with that if you are double priming. I rarely bother as it’s too much extra time and effort (and should be unnecessary), but if I do I like to get plenty of build on the first cycle so I can block it back nice and flat. Smooth isn’t always flat.

    On the second priming cycle I will use a more reduced primer as I should only be filling fine sanding scratches and maybe the odd break-through. This second round shold only need minimum sanding so I’ll agree there is some gain to be had from a smoother application. However, if we’re talking about poly (slick sand etc) then we’re not discussing final primers.

    As for tip size on primer guns you could always buy the biggest one you think you’ll need and wind it in a bit for less viscous stuff :)[/quote]

    Yeah maybe I should have given some background. I work at a classic car resto shop. All the cars get blasted bare, and made perfect from there. The cars we do are the type that we blow overspray where they would have it from the factory, the correct markings etc. The owner of the shop is a big shot at a big dealership here. So we also do light collision mixed in as well. So when we do the restos, they all get slick sand first, then a surfacer. I assure you I cant spray slick sand smooth! But the poly Feather Fill went on very very nice. Just as nice as any urethane 4:1 I have used before, and maybe better than I sprayed some 4:1 primers in the past.

    January 27, 2013 at 9:32 pm #40705

    [quote=”Jayson M” post=29675]Your right about that,after trying the 4400 extreme I have no interest in trying any other products from them.[/quote]

    I have the 4500 Xtreme, and so far i have only spray some crap SW clear with it. I wasnt impressed with it, but it wasnt a fair shot either. And Ive been spraying my clear with the HVLP as you know, so there will be a learning curve with it. Same with the mini extreme. I sprayed that John Deere crap paint with it, and it was ok, but for a $300 gun, didnt seem like anything special. But as I said, these were not fair shots with them.
    The primer gun, no matter how much it bothers you, is a good spraying gun. I have no doubt about that. If it was shit, i would be the first to come here and say just that. It would be in the dumpster, and something else on the way.

    January 27, 2013 at 9:40 pm #40706

    It doesn’t bother me,I just don’t like there products nothing more.If you are working in a high end resto shop why are you guys mismatching products and using(I understand JD green) cheap paint lines?For big $$$ cars you should be using top of the line products and keep within a system as no doubt you would have to warranty all of those big $$$ jobs.

    January 27, 2013 at 9:49 pm #40707

    Sorry, you need just a little deeper background. I started working at the high end shop about 90 days ago. I am transitioning from where I was at before. I used to work for a guy doing spit shine restos. You know, sand the paint flat “enough” repaint, and sell on craigslist. Semi, on the frame stuff. He wouldnt spend an extra nickle on materials, so thats why I moved on. He is a mega nice guy and became a pretty good friend, so I agreed to stay with him to try to finish a couple things up. So I was working days for the semi resto cheap stuff, and nights and weekends at the high end place. This was my first full week at the new place. Thats why you were seeing the cheap stuff mixed with the good stuff. The high end shop pretty much gives me whatever I want.

    January 27, 2013 at 9:50 pm #40708

    [quote=”gtome” post=29674]Not at all, but you cant seem to accept the idea that this could be a good primer gun.[/quote]

    I never used it. Maybe it is just that, a “good primer” gun. On the other site you said it is the [i]”Best primer gun ever”.[/i] Here you say the only other brand name used for a comparison was Finishline and never used the SATA. Comparisons can be done with varying degress of variables and thoroughness. Such as price, quality, longevity, parts availability, performance, number of products tested and experience. Stating one gun’s info without offering a comparison to many others, as well as paint products used is lacking a complete evaluation. If I get a demo gun I can say it shoots well, but others may perform just as well or better. Sales brochures are written in such a manner, they don’t offer detailed comparsions to the competition.

    January 27, 2013 at 10:05 pm #40709

    Ok, thats a fair point. I guess I was just saying, to me, its the best primer gun I have ever used, and the finish is better than anyone I have ever seen. I guess I dont get why I am getting beat down here? There are many more people stating what they feel is a good gun, and not a word said. When I mention the Sagola, I get the hammer. No one else listed every variable known to man, and they are simply accepted. Apparently my oppinion isnt valid here. Maybe to satify everyone here, I will demo the Sata this week. Which one would be an acceptable gun to demo to make my oppinion worthy?

    Or maybe if you dont use the same guns as Jayson, your just wrong here?

Viewing 15 posts - 31 through 45 (of 64 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.